Skip to content
Risk Hunter, home
FRENBook a demo
Menu

Use cases

Start from your deadline. Leave with a deliverable ready for review.

Four situations where Risk Hunter saves your experts the most time, without compromising on traceability.

CISOs and security teams

Continuous exposure & remediation

With frontier AI, disclosed vulnerabilities now number in the thousands. Your teams cannot fix everything: you need to know which ones threaten a critical service, what to do, and how to justify it.

Explore this use case: click the views

  1. 1

    Collect exposure

    Scan results, inventories, CMDB: assets, services, versions and vulnerabilities consolidated.

  2. 2

    Link to the business

    Every vulnerability is mapped to the asset, the service it supports and the relevant MITRE ATT&CK and ATLAS techniques.

  3. 3

    Simulate attack paths

    Attack paths and blind spots: the scenario’s likelihood is recalculated.

  4. 4

    Propose the response

    Fix, mitigate or accept, with a deadline and a rationale, prioritised by risk reduction.

  5. 5

    Approve and prove

    The CISO approves; the action is dated, attributed and linked to the requirements it covers.

Attack path · fictitious example

From a fake portal to encrypted servers

  1. T1566.002
    Spearphishing link
  2. T1539
    Steal web session cookie
  3. T1078.004
    Cloud accounts
  4. T1087.004
    Cloud account discovery
  5. T1133
    External remote services
  6. T1018
    Remote system discovery
  1. 1 · T1566.002
    Document management administrators receive a targeted email leading to a fake portal, an exact copy of the cloud platform.
  2. 2 · T1539
    The fake portal relays the login in real time and captures the session cookie: multi-factor authentication is bypassed.
  3. 3 · T1078.004
    The attacker opens the document management cloud admin console with a legitimate account. Their activity looks normal.

… then 7 more steps through to encryption: accounts, admin VPN, data-centre servers, defences disabled, backups deleted.

Illustration: an attack path as Risk Hunter generates it, fictitious example.

Operational scenario, fictitious example

A ransomware attack, told end to end

  1. 1The attacker spots a provider’s VPN portal exposed to the Internet.
  2. 2They get in with stolen credentials, as there is no multi-factor authentication.
  3. 3They pivot to the internal network through remote desktop: a blind spot.
  4. 4They exfiltrate customer data to their server.
  5. 5They encrypt the servers: billing stops.
High likelihoodEstimated impact ≈ €1.2M

The action that breaks the chain

Multi-factor authentication and segregated provider access: breaks steps 2 and 3.

MITRE ATT&CK: T1595 · T1078 · T1021 · T1041 · T1486

Fictitious example; organisation and amounts are illustrative.

Risk Hunter demo thumbnail: from vulnerability to remediationWatch the demo · 3 min

From an infrastructure scan to a costed remediation plan: 6 devices, 20 vulnerabilities, 13 attack scenarios, 13 actions. Demo data.

What you get

A list of priorities justified by business risk, a remediation plan with owners and deadlines, and a record of every trade-off.

You fix what threatens the business first, and you can defend that choice.

See a demo of this use case

The frontier AI era

AI finds vulnerabilities by the thousand. The bottleneck is the decision.

In a single month, Claude Mythos Preview, Anthropic’s model reserved for cyber-defence partners, reported more than 10,000 high- or critical-severity vulnerabilities. The window between disclosure and exploitation keeps shrinking: detection is no longer enough, you have to decide what to fix first.

Triage by business risk

Every vulnerability is linked to your assets, your critical services and attack techniques. You see the ones that threaten the business, not just the ones with the highest score.

Propose the right response

Fix, mitigate or accept: for each vulnerability, a response with its deadline and rationale, prioritised by the risk it reduces.

Prove every trade-off

What is fixed, deferred or accepted stays dated, attributed and linked to the requirements it covers. Ready for the auditor and the regulator.

Risk Hunter does not replace your detection tools: it helps you decide which of their findings matter. At its core are our exposure decision engine and our continuous evidence engine, covered by two filed patents.

Watch the video

Source: Anthropic, Project Glasswing, first review, May 2026. Claude Mythos is a trademark of Anthropic; Risk Hunter is not affiliated with Anthropic.

Compliance & audit

Audit & compliance

An ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA or HDS audit is coming up. Usually, the auditor reads a sample of documents and writes every finding by hand.

Explore this use case: click the views

  1. 1

    Choose the framework and scope

    ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, HDS; company, subsidiaries or projects.

  2. 2

    Import your documents

    Policies, procedures, BCPs, DRPs, diagrams: as they are.

  3. 3

    Assess every requirement

    Status, gap, rationale and source excerpt, across all documents.

  4. 4

    Generate the action plan

    Every gap becomes an action linked to the risks it reduces.

  5. 5

    Approve and track

    The auditor approves; maturity is tracked from one audit to the next.

Actual Risk Hunter screen: GDPR audit questionnaire with the compliance rate per chapter and article
Actual screen: GDPR audit, compliance tracked chapter by chapter.

What you get

A pre-audit structured according to ISO 19011, deliverables designed for ISO/IEC 17021-1 certification audits, and an action plan linked to risks.

The auditor verifies instead of writing.

See a demo of this use case

Procurement, third-party risk, DORA

Third parties & DORA

A managed service provider administers your servers remotely. If it is compromised, the attacker gets in with legitimate access. DORA and NIS2 require you to control that risk.

Explore this use case: click the views

  1. 1

    Map the ecosystem

    Suppliers, providers, managed service providers, and their role in your critical services.

  2. 2

    Assess every third party

    Dependency, penetration, cyber maturity and trust: the threat level of every third party.

  3. 3

    Build the scenario

    The attack that comes through the third party, and its impact on your operations.

  4. 4

    Require the right measures

    Your own audit templates become contractual requirements and supplier security assurance plans; likelihood is recalculated.

  5. 5

    Track and prove

    Measures tracked over time, linked to DORA requirements (ICT third-party risk) and NIS2 (Art. 21(2)(d)).

Actual Risk Hunter screen: ecosystem threat map, with suppliers, customers and partners positioned by threat levelActual Risk Hunter screen: stakeholders scored on dependency, penetration, cyber maturity and trust
Actual screens: the ecosystem threat map (before or after treatment), then each third party scored on dependency, penetration, cyber maturity and trust. Demo data.

Strategic scenario, fictitious example

The attack that comes through your partner

  1. SourceAn organised cybercrime group seeking a ransom.
  2. Third partyYour managed service provider, which administers your servers remotely.
  3. PathThey compromise the provider, then use its legitimate access: a blind spot.
  4. ImpactBilling is down for several days.
High third-party threatCritical severity

Measures on the third party

Administration bastion, multi-factor authentication, right-to-audit clause: likelihood goes down.

MITRE ATT&CK: T1199

Fictitious example.

What you get

A map of critical third parties, a threat level per supplier, your supplier audit templates, contractual clauses and security assurance plans, and a record of their implementation.

Your supplier requirements are justified by risk, and documented.

See a demo of this use case

CISOs, accreditation authorities

EBIOS RM accreditation

A system needs security accreditation. By hand, the risk analysis takes weeks of workshops with the CISO, IT, business teams and providers.

Explore this use case: click the views

  1. 1

    Scope and security baseline

    Scope, business assets and supporting assets, pre-filled from your documents.

  2. 2

    Risk origins

    Risk origins and target objectives, proposed and justified.

  3. 3

    Strategic scenarios

    Paths through the ecosystem and stakeholders.

  4. 4

    Operational scenarios

    Attack paths detailed as MITRE ATT&CK techniques, blind spots included.

  5. 5

    Risk treatment

    Measures, residual risks, treatment plan, submitted for approval.

Actual Risk Hunter screen: risk graph, on demo data
Actual screen: risk graph, demo data.

What you get

A complete EBIOS RM analysis, ready for review, and the documents for the accreditation file.

One person launches the analysis; your experts step in to review it, with no workshops needed to produce it.

See a demo of this use case

Which of these use cases applies to you?

Show us your next deadline: we’ll show you the deliverable Risk Hunter prepares.

* Required fields. Your details are sent to Risk Hunter so we can respond to your request. Privacy

Book a demo